![]()
(CSIP)
Allan
Markley, Ed.D. School Improvement
Committee (SIC) Gary Hogue, Ed.D.
Supt. Formally
Adopted-June 1996
Asst. Supt.
Revised
4/2006
The
The
size of the district comprises an area of approximately 123 square miles. Student data indicates that
approximately 50% of the district’s students are from
The
The district has been recognized
for “Distinction in Academic Performance” for four out of the five years the
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has presented the
award. The district is fully “Accredited” by the Missouri State Board of
Education and offers a variety of excellent programs for all grade levels Pre K
through 12. There are also many
co-curricular and extracurricular activities which are available for students
of all ages. The college preparatory,
dual credit, advanced placement, and vocational training programs are strong,
with over 70% of recent year’s graduates attending postsecondary educational
institutions. The district also has the
distinction of being one of
The student population continues
to grow steadily. The population of Rogersville
is approximately 2085; however, there are 4040 households, with approximately
10,000 individuals living within the Rogersville (65742) zip code. In April 2002, a $14.9 million dollar bond
issue was passed to construct a new high school, install district-wide air
conditioning, and connect the existing high school (future middle school) and
new high school to sanitary sewage into the city of
The Logan-Rogersville School District R-VIII has currently
appointed the following individuals as the district’s 2005-2006 Comprehensive
School Improvement Planning (CSIP) Committee to develop the local improvement
plan.
Name Group
Represented
Allan
Markley District
Administration, Chair
Yolanda
Anderson High
School Administration
Toni
Bass Primary
Elem. Administration
Sophie
Blount High
School Student
Mary
Carey Advocacy
Group/Parent
Jeremy
Denief High
School Student
Jane
Entrekin Middle
School Faculty
Debbie
Fax Primary
Elem. Faculty
Tim
Felton Board
Member/Parent
J.
D. Fielden Board
Member
Jack
Funkhouser Advocacy
Group/Parent
Aaron
Gerla Middle
School Administration/Faculty
Marvin
Grier Board
Member/Parent
Linda
Hall Primary
Elem. Faculty
Cindy
Hamilton Primary
Elem. Faculty
Pat
Hetherington Upper
Elementary Faculty
Gary
Hogue District
Administration
Teri
Jernigan Upper
Elem. Administration
Kyle
Jessen Board
Member/Parent
Jennifer
Katzin Upper
Elem. Administration
Danielle
Keene High
School Student
Linda
Keeth Middle
School Faculty
Bill
Kirkpatrick Advocacy
Group/Patron
Toby
Kite High
School Faculty
Brandon
Kovach District
Technical Support
Kodi
Logan Middle
School Faculty
Marc
Manczuk Advocacy
Group/Parent
Becky
Mathenia Advocacy
Group/Parent
Carrie
McClure High
School Student
Kevin
McComas District
Administration
Clay
& Jamie McGranahan Advocacy
Group/Parent
Rick
McPheeters Middle
School Administration
Chuck
Medley Board
Member/Parent
Carolyn
Salam A+
School Coordinator
Dwight
Samuel Patron
Jenny
Shriver High
School Faculty
Jessica
Spragg Advocacy
Group/Parent
Lisa
Spragg Board
Member/Parent
Colleen
Stone Board
Member/Parent
Jeremy
Tucker High
School Administration
Nancy
Zahn Advocacy
Member/Parent
The school and local community population contains a
very small percentage (less than 1%) of minority groups. Mr. Kevin McComas, coordinator of Migrant
Education and English as a Second Language, serves as the committee’s minority
representative. The school and local
community are predominantly made up of white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants who
comprise the lower to upper-middle socio-economic class. The CSIP Committee is representative of the
community and school regarding gender equity and the other aforementioned factors. Mr. Kevin McComas, Special Services Director,
and the district’s building counselors are direct advocates for students
requiring special needs.
The CSIP Committee had its first formal meeting on
February 15, 1996. The first order of
business was the establishment of operational procedures. A planning process involving tentative
monthly meetings through the month of June was established in order to develop
a single, written Comprehensive School Improvement Plan (CSIP) and to submit it
to the department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) by July 1996
(final approval was mandated by July 15, 1996).
The CSIP is maintained through an on-going, dynamic process that
emphasizes local improvement efforts through a minimum timeline of five years
beyond the current date.
1.
All students will
graduate from high school.
2.
All students will
complete a rigorous and meaningful path of studies with specific learning
outcomes.
3.
All students will
proceed to college, technical school, vocational school, or job opportunities
with the knowledge and skills necessary to be successful.
4.
All students will
demonstrate proficient communication skills.
5.
All students will
develop global perspectives and civic responsibilities.
6.
All students will
recognize and apply changing technology.
7.
All students will
develop appropriate interactive skills.
8.
All students will
use problem-solving and critical thinking skills.
9.
All students will
develop the ability to be self-directed, life-long learners.
10.
All students will
understand physical fitness and the benefits of a healthy lifestyle.
11.
All students will
have an awareness of creative expression.
All
students are provided with district-wide performance standards that correlate
with the
1.
The district
provides over 100 high school credits, which exceeds the number required to
meet the MSIP standard of desirable credits.
In addition, the district meets the desirable standard for units of
credit in nine subject areas. The
district also provides courses in four vocational areas (MSIP Standard 1.3).
2.
The district’s
librarian-to-student staffing ratio meets the desirable standards at the primary,
upper elementary, the middle school and the high school (MSIP Standard 3.1).
3.
The district’s
principal-to-student staffing ratio meets the desirable standards at the
primary, upper elementary, the middle school, and the high school level (MSIP
Standard 4.3).
4.
5.
The climate of
the district is exceptional. The board,
community, parents, staff, and students interact positively and expect and
support high academic standards.
Students and staff are recognized in numerous ways (MSIP Standards 6.5
and 6.7).
6.
The district has
developed a budget document for board review that includes extensive and
comprehensive information concerning the financial condition of district
programs and services (MSIP Standard 8.6).
7.
The percentage of
students scoring at or above the national average on the ACT has been at a high
level since 1992 (The MSIP Standard 9.3).
8.
Highly effective
faculty/staff is noted by longitudinal MAP & ACT results, MSIP Strengths,
and the overall impressions of district patrons (CSIP and MSIP Standard 6.2).
9.
A comprehensive
Special Services program was specifically cited for early Childhood Special
Education and Early Childhood Title I services (MSIP Special Services
Report/CSIP/MSIP Standards 7.1, 7.4, and 7.5).
10.
Exemplary
instructional facilities at all four-attendance centers are available to
sustain essential school programs (CSIP).
11.
Initiation of the
A+ Schools/Articulated Studies is an alternative program for those students
contemplating postsecondary vocational education, direct entrance into the work
force, or who are unsure of specific college/university preparation (CSIP/MSIP
Standards 7.3 and 7.8).
12.
The percentage of
graduating students entering some type of postsecondary education was 83% after
the 1994-95 school year and 80% after the 1995-96 academic year. This percentage has remained consistently
high, well above an average of 70% for the previous five years (Post-High
School Follow-Up Surveys/MSIP Standard 9.5).
13.
Support from the
community is strong. This is especially
noted through the support and participation of the local Chamber of Commerce,
Parent-Teacher Association (PTA), Booster Club, Parent Involvement Plan,
Logan-Rogersville Education Foundation, and the L-R Wellness program along with
other school and community groups (CSIP).
14.
Successful
“Gifted”, Advanced Placement, and Dual Credit programs have been implemented at
the elementary, middle school, & high school levels (CSIP/MSIP Standard
7.2).
15.
Development of the
“After School” and “Before School” programs at the Primary Elementary has been
successful. These after school programs
provide childcare at a minimal cost for children in the district.
16.
Students feel
safe and secure in the current district environment (CSIP/MSIP Standard 8.11).
17.
The district provides
formal preschool educational programs, as well as other preschool educational
activities, to meet the needs of its students.
The district’s Parents as Teachers program serves 68 percent of the
total eligible families, compared to the state average of 42 percent.
18.
Sixty-seven
percent of district patrons voted to pass a 14.9 million dollar bond issue to
construct a new high school facility and air condition all existing facilities
(April 2002).
19.
The district
received state recognition for “Distinction in Academic Performance” for four
out of the five years that the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education has been recognizing school districts in
20.
Safety audits
were conducted by EDU-SAFE consultants during the 2001-2002 school year.
21.
An “anti-bullying”
program was initiated in grades K-5 during the 2003-2004 school year.
22.
Exterior and
interior surveillance cameras are installed at both the high school and the
middle school.
23.
The Rogersville
Community 2000 & Safe and Drug Free Schools accomplishments include: Best Practice Programs, “Strengthening
Families,” “Communities That Care,” and “Communities Mobilizing for Change on
Alcohol,” “What’s Your Anti-Drug” mural, SADD (Students Against Destructive
Decisions), TATU (Teens Against Tobacco Use), 8th Grade Drug Free
Party, Safe and Drug-Free Youth Surveys, community forums, anti-drug
billboards, Community Health & Safety Fair (February 2004) sponsored by the
PTA, Parent & Family Life Education, and C2000, the Mayor’s Task Force (2005-2006),
and “Parent Drug Awareness Night”. Revised and updated curriculum guides are in
accordance with
24.
The
AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT
(1) PROVIDING ALL
STUDENTS A FAIR
|
Objective 1: Maintain a formal written procedure for
identifying at-risk students at all grade levels (MSIP Standard 7.1) |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
Special Services Director Building Principals Counselors Nurses Federal Programs
Coordinator |
Expand the periodic and
Continuous Screening process already in place to incorporate a written,
systematic at-risk identification system. |
On-going Partially Funded: Federal
Programs, Title I |
Final Board approval of
district at-risk policy. Continuous identification
of at-risk students. |
|
COMPLETED: Yes £ No £
On-going R A formal,
written procedure for identifying at-risk students that begins with the Early
Childhood Program and is maintained through the 12th grade was
completed in the Spring of 2000.
Procedures will be revisited and updated as required by State
Standards. |
|||
|
Objective 2: Implement advanced placement and dual
credit courses in grades 9-12 (MSIP Standard 7.2). |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
High School Principal High School Asst. Principal Curriculum Director |
Recruit certificated
personnel that are qualified to teach advanced placement and dual credit
courses at the high school level. |
On-going |
Core Data reports submitted
to DESE. |
|
COMPLETED: Yes £ No £
On-going R Mr. Greg
Katzin is currently teaching a History class and Mr. Matt McCroskey is
teaching an English class that has
been DESE approved as an advanced placement course. Plans are in place for
Mr. Aaron Roten to begin teaching AP Art for the 2006-2007 school year.
Currently, Ms. Julia Ritter teaches dual credit Speech and College English,
Mrs. Laura Kovach teaches dual credit Physics and College Algebra, and Mrs.
Charlotte Mistler teaches dual credit Chemistry. Plans for Mr. Greg Katzin to
teach dual credit History are in place for the 2006-2007 school year. Dual
Credit or Advanced Placement Spanish is currently being investigated. |
|||
|
Objective 3: Meet the MSIP Standard for library/media
center space at the Primary, Upper Elementary, and Middle School libraries
(MSIP Standard 3.1). |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Building Principals Librarians |
(1) Develop estimated
construction costs for the renovation and expansion of the existing
library/media centers to meet the MSIP minimum standard for library
space. (2) Incorporate plans for
expansion during transition phase of the new high school. |
(1) On-going (2) On-going |
Renovation of existing
facilities. |
|
COMPLETED: Yes £ No £
On-going R |
|||
|
Objective 4: Develop and maintain articulation
agreements with the district’s agriculture, business, marketing and
cooperative education, and family and consumer sciences vocational education
programs (MSIP Standard 7.3) |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
High School Principal Curriculum Director Vocational Instructors |
(1) Work in conjunction with OTC ( (2) Provide high school vocational teachers with access
and communication with OTC to maintain articulation agreement
responsibilities. |
On-going |
MSIP Review Administrator monitoring |
|
COMPLETED: Yes £ No £
On-going R The
district currently has eight
articulation agreements: two in the business education department for
Accounting I and II; two in the vocational agriculture department for
Agricultural Structures I and II, and four in the Family and Consumer
Sciences Department in Hospitality I and II and Early Childhood Development I
and II for the school year 2006-2007. Applications in the fall (2006) for
Business Systems Technology classes will be actively pursued. |
|||
(2) IMPROVING TEACHING AND LEARNING
|
Objective 1: Maintain class sizes that meet the minimum
MSIP resource standards (MSIP 2.1). |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
Superintendent Building Principals |
(1) Hire additional
faculty/staff to adequately meet the minimum and/or desirable standards for
class size as indicated by the Core Data system report. (2) Continue to utilize
federal Class-Size Reduction funds to work toward reducing class size in
grades PreK-3 to 18 students or less. |
On-going |
The district’s Core Data
report reflects meeting the MSIP minimum
standard for class size. |
|
COMPLETED: Yes £ No £
On-going R Goal is
on-going; it will continue to be a focus as the population of the district
increases. |
|||
|
Objective 2: Make state of the art technology available
to all students, faculty, and staff (MSIP Standard 6.4). |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
Technology Director Curriculum Director Building Principals Fed. Programs Coordinator |
(1) Install enhanced technology capabilities in all district buildings. (2) Install computer labs in the Primary, Upper Elementary, and Middle School facilities. |
2002-2007 (on-going) Funded: Federal Program,
Title V |
MSIP Evaluation and 3-5
Year Educational Plans |
|
COMPLETED: Yes £ No £
On-going R The District
presently has 850 computers in service. Plans for the 2006-2007 school year
include improvements to the Upper Elementary and Middle School Computer Labs.
Installation of 14 Smart Boards at the Primary is planned for the 2006-2007
school year. |
|||
|
Objective 3: Meet NCLB (federal legislation No Child Left
Behind) in AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) for all grade levels. |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
Superintendent Building Principals Assessment Director Testing Coordinators Curriculum Director |
(1) Continue to review and
revise the district’s curriculum (emphasizing scope and sequence) upon
analysis of AYP data. (2) Improve communication
to parents through parent-teacher conferences, newsletters, and the local
newspapers to emphasize the significance of AYP and MAP. |
On-going |
Yearly AYP data |
|
COMPLETED: Yes £ No £
On-going R |
|||
|
Objective 4: Meet the MSIP Performance Standard for MAP
at all grade levels. |
|||
|
Individual(s) Responsible |
Strategy |
Timeline |
Assessment |
|
Assessment
Director Testing
Coordinators Curriculum
Director Building
Principals |
(1) Review the district’s
curriculum (emphasizing scope and sequence) to include all relevant Show-Me
Standards, Grade Level Expectations, and local curriculum guidelines. (2) Improve communication
to parents through parent-teacher conferences, newsletters, and the local
newspapers. (3) Maintain strategies to
emphasize the significance of MAP test results to all students. |
||